Monthly Archives: September 2009


The Future is Already Here 8

DougPeteTweetDeckThe Future is Already Here … it’s just not very evenly distributed.
William Gibson
Attribution

Listen to the NPR Interview Nov 30, 1999

Ontario educator Doug Peterson (@dougpete on Twitter) sent out a tweet yesterday morning which immediately caught my attention, “Just blogged: Great opportunity for Ontario Teachers. Yesterday, the Ministry of Education announced …”

A short link through to Doug’s Off the Record blog had me reading about the immediate availability of a new piece of OSAPAC-licensed software for use in Ontario publicly-funded schools, Bitstrips for Schools.  The Ontario Ministry of Education, supported by the direction of OSAPAC, had finalized licensing arrangements to procure a modified-for-education version of the existing Bitstrips, and was announcing that the augmented site was ready-for-access by Ontario teachers and students. Not only would the modified version provide an “education-friendly” environment, but it would also include an easy-to-use management framework.

Here’s my first attempt with the software (with a small measure of editorializing thrown in for spice):

TheFutureHasArrived

So, as referenced in piece above, shortly after reading Doug’s post, I was on the Bitstrips For Schools site. Within mere moments, I had activated my account, created a class grouping, and set up my student accounts. (The registration page included a drop down selector for school district, and then school — it then validated against my district email account. Easy Peasy.)

And it is in this ease-of-access that I find a profound potential.

The ease with which Ontario teachers can access this new software application, with all of its attendant student-collaboration potential, is unheard of in my experience  for an OSAPAC release. (Certainly the local implementation of Gizmos, for example (another OSAPAC-licensed web-app) — and the attendant user codes — have yet to make their way out into our schools from the district office. Not sure what’s up with that.) Granted, some teachers may require some support and/or training to make use of this software. Finding an appropriate curriculum context will also be important for others. But there’s no doubt in my mind that students will take to this with ease. The fact that it requires NO installation or subsequent technical support on the part of district IT departments, however, really strikes my fancy. And the ability for students to access the web-app from home, bodes well for where we need to be going. As an initial case-study, I see this as a wonderful indication of what is potentially to come. If the easy registration of teacher accounts and subordinate student accounts (as established via OSAPAC/EDU) works in this application, then it paves the way for OSAPAC and the Ministry of Education to employ the same strategy in rolling out other web/cloud-based applications. The sooner, the better. A provincially-licensed blogging or writing process tool, anyone?

Granted, this may run the risk of being potentially perceived by some as a bit of a challenge to local district edicts/policies — if they’re not already onboard — but I hope not. After all, the times, they are a’ changing. With eLearning providing education directly to some students in their homes already, we all need to be looking forward and embracing the aspects of educational technology that can truly work to empower learners and educators alike.

As for the Gibson quote, there’s no doubt that the uneven distribution of the future remains a significant issue for us all to wrestle with.

But I,  for one, applaud OSAPAC and the Ministry for their vision in taking this step forward. This act clearly demonstrates the potential for a more even distribution of the future moving forward …  🙂

What are your thoughts?  Is this a good way for OSAPAC and the Ministry to keep moving?


Response to "Why Everyone Needs a Great PLN" 1

Philly Teacher
Philly TeacherMary Beth Hertz (@mbteach on Twitter, Philly Teacher on blogger.com) is a highly valued member of my PLN (Professional/Personal Learning Network). I met Mary Beth in Washington, DC at the annual ISTE EdTech conference — NECC09, and we have continued to maintain a valuable ongoing dialogue in the months since that time. As a dedicated and forward-looking educator in Phillidelphia, Mary Beth regularly blogs about her adventures in moving-forward the learning opportunities for her students and her personal practice.
Today Mary Beth blogged about her first day of the 2009-10 school year, some challenges encountered by her students and school, and the very important value of her PLN to her in her role. (If you are new to the concept of the PLN, Mary Beth’s post includes some excellent links to starting points in developing your own network.)
Here are my comments, as inspired by Mary Beth’s post.
Hey there, Mary Beth.
So much of what you write is reminiscent of discussions we had with folks at NECC this past June/July — the PLN movement IS gaining some traction, in no small part due to Twitter and the related social media and 2.0 explosion, but the numbers of folks who are diving in and embracing the concept seem to mirror the rush of the general educational population to embrace technology in general – that is to say, rushing very slowly.   As we experienced at NECC, many of the presenters there were preaching to the converted.  Presenters and attendees alike have a huge challenge in supporting the remaining majority of our colleagues in embracing both technology and the PLN concept.
Personally, I can’t believe that the limited numbers of our “local PLN members” are entirely due to differences in adoption rates of technology. When you reference your interest in discussing Educational Leadership or other professional journals versus conversations about last night’s TV shows, I can’t help but think that we’re seeing artifacts of the institutionalization of education, and a counter-intuitive de-professionalization of our role. With school/district administration providing direction on one hand, and unions exerting member-protecting influences on the other hand, (and in no way forgetting the needs of our student and their parents on the third hand), educators today can be placed into a mode of continual reaction — reacting to significant constraints, considerable pressures, and overload in terms of continually changing expectations.
Unfortunately, there is a significant difference between reaction and response — and even more so in the case of purposeful, planned response.
And it is this planned, purposeful response which can sometimes be so significantly constrained within our profession.
Add in the challenge of balancing career commitments and personal life, and we have dedicated folks who are placed in a position of having very little time to focus on self-directed professional growth. Unfortunately, the traditional district models of Professional Development (PD, “in-service,” – shot in the arm) continue to be the norm.  (I recall a statistic from a few years back which referenced an approximate annual 5% expenditure towards staff education/training in business/industry — and an incredibly disproportionate <1% allocation in the Education sector. While I have no recent data, my guess would be that we’re no better, and most likely, even worse, than before.)  Too many PD models continues to reflect the historic top-down, worker-as-cog model. Cogs are part of the larger machine — they aren’t supposed to re-define their roles or respond independently or even collaboratively to change the machine’s function.  (Unless they’re parts of a Deming-type machine. Which tends not to be the in-effect model within schools.)
When I look at the efforts of Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach and Will Richardson with their Professional Learning Practice (“PLP”) initiative <http://plpnetwork.com/>, I see a long-term, team-oriented, job-embedded approach which has the potential to achieve a significant transformational result — similar to the effects obtained through university-level PD courses. But even these effects require buy-in and commitment, and this is where the influences referenced above can really interfere with full engagement.
As much as I’d like to see an immediate and significant development of effective “local PLNs,” Twitter-networks, online sharing networks, and technology-mediated collaboration, we need both the vision and direction from education bureaucrats and educational administration to support such efforts on an institutional scale, and a shift in perception and engagement from front line educators towards a clearer understanding of how our need for greater empowerment must come from within. Not insignificant in this is the need for the networks to be valued and organized by the individual in response to their needs and interests. (And by-the-by, moving forward, such is the reality for our students, as well.)
My path through my early education followed the traditional model as described in Richard N. Bolles’ book, The Three Boxes of Life (the three boxes being Education, Work, and Retirement), but my early formative work experiences in education, coupled with some fortuitous connections during my education degree, deeply ingrained the “life-long learner” philosophy — a belief that continually drives my exploration of learning, educating and edTech. This “learning for life” belief (and the development of complementary skills to support it) is SO critical for today’s educators and students alike. Without this understanding, and without the skills and time to follow through, there can be no significant personally-planned response for ongoing, professional development.
Ontario colleague Doug Peterson commented on an earlier post here on edVisioned.ca, and referenced the very real benefits that new information communication technologies offer in allowing us to connect and develop our collective visions and skills in the absence of significant local direction/collaboration.   It may be, that in the interim, those of us looking to reach forward and “push back the outside of the envelope” will need to continue to draw strength and support from the at-distance PLN. For as we work locally to establish frameworks and work to support our colleagues as change and technology marches on, there is no doubt in my mind that the requisite source of enlightenment and empowerment for this sometimes daunting task will be found in the online PLN revolution.

Philly TeachermbteachMary Beth Hertz (@mbteach on Twitter, Philly Teacher on blogger.com) is a highly valued member of my PLN (Professional/Personal Learning Network). I met Mary Beth in Washington, DC at the annual ISTE EdTech conference — NECC09, and we have continued to maintain a valuable ongoing dialogue in the months since that time. As a dedicated and forward-looking educator in Philadelphia, Mary Beth regularly blogs about her adventures in moving-forward the learning opportunities for her students and her personal practice.

Today Mary Beth wrote a wonderful blog post entitled “Why Everyone Needs a Great PLN,”  about her first day of the 2009-10 school year, some challenges encountered by her students and school, and the very important value of her PLN to her in her role. (If you are new to the concept of the PLN, Mary Beth’s post includes some excellent links to starting points in developing your own network.)

Here are my comments, as inspired by Mary Beth’s post.

Hey there, Mary Beth.

So much of what you write is reminiscent of discussions we had with folks at NECC this past June/July — the PLN movement IS gaining some traction, in no small part due to Twitter and the related social media and 2.0 explosion, but the numbers of folks who are diving in and embracing the concept seem to mirror the rush of the general educational population to embrace technology in general – that is to say, rushing very slowly.   As we experienced at NECC, many of the presenters there were preaching to the converted.  Presenters and attendees alike have a huge challenge in supporting the remaining majority of our colleagues in embracing both technology and the PLN concept.

Personally, I can’t believe that the limited numbers of our “local PLN members” are entirely due to differences in adoption rates of technology. When you reference your interest in discussing Educational Leadership or other professional journals versus conversations about last night’s TV shows, I can’t help but think that we’re seeing artifacts of the institutionalization of education, and a counter-intuitive de-professionalization of our role. With school/district administration providing direction on one hand, and unions exerting member-protecting influences on the other hand, (and in no way forgetting the needs of our student and their parents on the third hand), educators today can be placed into a mode of continual reaction — reacting to significant constraints, considerable pressures, and overload in terms of continually changing expectations.

Unfortunately, there is a significant difference between reaction and response — and even more so in the case of purposeful, planned response.

And it is this planned, purposeful response which can sometimes be so significantly constrained within our profession.

Add in the challenge of balancing career commitments and personal life, and we have dedicated folks who are placed in a position of having very little time to focus on self-directed professional growth. Unfortunately, the traditional district models of Professional Development (PD, “in-service,” – shot in the arm) continue to be the norm.  (I recall a statistic from a few years back which referenced an approximate annual 5% expenditure towards staff education/training in business/industry — and an incredibly disproportionate <1% allocation in the Education sector. While I have no recent data, my guess would be that we’re no better, and most likely, even worse, than before.)  Too many PD models continues to reflect the historic top-down, worker-as-cog model. Cogs are part of the larger machine — they aren’t supposed to re-define their roles or respond independently or even collaboratively to change the machine’s function.  (Unless they’re parts of a Deming-type machine, which tends not to be the in-effect model within schools.)

“To successfully respond to the myriad of changes that shake the world, transformation into a new style of management is required. The route to take is what I call profound knowledge—knowledge for leadership of transformation.”  – W. Edwards Deming

PLP

Powerful Learning Practice network

When I look at the efforts of Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach and Will Richardson with their Powerful Learning Practice (“PLP”) initiative, I see a long-term, team-oriented, job-embedded approach which has the potential to achieve a significant transformational result — similar to the effects obtained through university-level PD courses. But even these effects require buy-in and commitment, and this is where the influences referenced above can really interfere with full engagement.

As much as I’d like to see an immediate and significant development of effective “local PLNs,” Twitter-networks, online sharing networks, and technology-mediated collaboration, we need both the vision and direction from education bureaucrats and educational administration to support such efforts on an institutional scale, and a shift in perception and engagement from front line educators towards a clearer understanding of how our need for greater empowerment must come from within. Not insignificant in this is the need for the networks to be valued and organized by the individual in response to their needs and interests. (And by-the-by, moving forward, such is the reality for our students, as well.)

ThreeBoxesOfLifeMy path through my early education followed the first third of the traditional model as described in Richard N. Bolles’ book, The Three Boxes of Life (the three boxes being Education, Work, and Retirement), but my early formative work experiences in education, coupled with some fortuitous connections during my education degree, deeply ingrained the “life-long learner” philosophy — a belief that continually drives my exploration of learning, educating and edTech. This “learning for life” belief (and the development of complementary skills to support it) is SO critical for today’s educators and students alike. Without this understanding, and without the skills and time to follow through, there can be no significant personally-planned response for ongoing, professional development.

Ontario colleague Doug Peterson commented on an earlier post here on edVisioned.ca, and referenced the very real benefits that new information communication technologies offer in allowing us to connect and develop our collective visions and skills in the absence of significant local direction/collaboration.   It may be, that in the interim, those of us looking to reach forward and “push back the outside of the envelope” will need to continue to draw strength and support from the at-distance PLN. For as we work locally to establish frameworks and work to support our colleagues as change and technology marches on, there is no doubt in my mind that the requisite source of enlightenment and empowerment for this sometimes daunting task will be found in the online PLN revolution.


Push Back the Outside of the Envelope 1

There was a demon that lived in the air.

They said whoever challenged him would die.

Their controls would freeze up. Their planes would buffet wildly.

And they would disintegrate.

The demon lived at Mach One on the meter. 750 miles an hour, where the air could no longer move out of the way.

He lived behind a barrier through which they said no man could ever pass.

– opening narration from The Right Stuff

The first seven minutes of the film: (removed from YouTube) Another, edited version:

The metaphor of “pushing back the outside of the envelope,” as referenced here in the tangible attempts of breaking the sound barrier, has been a touchstone for me since I first saw this film in the early 1980s. Coupled with a reluctance to ever be satisfied with the Status Quo, the notion of continually working to advance methods and practice to support improvement in learning remains a prime motivator for me to this day.

TheRightStuff If you have never seen Philip Kaufman’s “The Right Stuff,” I wholeheartedly recommend it. Based on the bestseller by Tom Wolfe, not only does it paint a truly heroic picture of the history of the flights of the early test pilots and Mercury 7 astronauts, it skillfully blends the work of many fine actors in both leading and cameo roles together with historic archival footage to produce in an incredibly entertaining epic. (8 Oscar nominations, 4 wins.)

Wikipedia entry on the Flight Envelope

Wikipedia entry on idiom Pushing the Envelope

Where did the phrase pushing the envelope originate?

  • Is striving to “push the envelope” a component of your professional practice?
  • How important is this metaphor in your context?

Obama's Back-to-School Address 2

obama_portrait_146px

US President Obama

On Tuesday, September 8th, 2009, U.S. President Barack Obama will address his nation’s schoolchildren, with a message of encouragement and challenge. The speech will be broadcast on cSpan and streamed live on the Internet, starting at 12:00 noon and timed to run for around 18 minutes.
And you would not believe the controversy that has arisen in The States as a result.

Note that the word “Some” should be judiciously applied to each and every one of the statements above! Suffice to say, the very fact that there is considerable discussion around the “banning” of Obama’s speech in the first place has many educators in dismay.

canada-flagFirst, a disclaimer. I am a Canadian educator, teaching in a middle school in Ontario, Canada. Are you surprised to know that I intend to screen the speech and discuss it with my students grade 7 students on Tuesday? Why, you might ask?

I guess on one hand, I figure it’s going to be a good speach, dynamically delivered, and intended for an audience pretty much congruent with my own students. And I don’t think the border between our two countries will change the context for my students too significantly, do you? After all, learners are learners. And I’m sure we’ll be more than capable of unpacking any specific-to-The-States rhetoric and applying our own Canadian view.

But why do I really see this as an activity worthy of devoting an hour (or maybe an afternoon) for my grade 7 students? Because I believe that our children need to see, hear, discuss, and learn in an environment shaped by effective leadership. They need to respond to the challenge of learning.

So what makes Obama and his speech a good candidate for such a learning opportunity?

1) Delivery: Obama’s reputatation as a dynamic speaker preceeds him.
2) Audience: Obama is addressing students directly, with a message intended to speak to their context.
3) Message: Obama’s message will encourage grade school students (K-12) to set goals, work hard, and persevere. The importance of personal responsibility, and the need to take their education very seriously will be key messages. Sounds valuable.
4) Reputation: Obama has set a very valued precedent with his annual Fathers’ Day efforts. He is on record for several years now in advocating for fathers to “Step Up” and take greater responsibility for their children. (Watch Obama’s  2008 Fathers’ Day speech.) To me, this seems like formal leadership incarnate: setting an important challenge, encouraging others to follow.

(A quick review of Tuesday’s Speech Notes, posted online a day before the address, show that Obama is not side-stepping or sugar-coating this very present and pressing reality of modern society. In his speech to schoolchildren, he speaks directly about his own childhood and absentee father, and of the many challenges that students must also learn to overcome. Powerful words. Powerful encouragement.)

5) Position: Obama is the elected leader of our neighbour to the south. With that endorsement comes considerable status, and his actions and influences do affect us in our country. Makes sense to listen.

Now, as to the consternation in the US:

Audacity of HopeThe considerable debate seems to arise from partisan concerns within the different camps of the American political scene. One of the first themes Obama addresses in his most recent book, The Audacity of Hope ( … oh yeah, he’s also written books, too …) is that of the historically partisan nature of American politics. Were Congress and the Senate to do a better job at transcending those party lines, far more energy could be positively focussed on making things work better. (When I see our own Canadian Members of Parliament shouting across the floor of the House of Commons at one another during Question Period, I shudder. Don’t you? We expect more from our elected representatives.) And so, in this instance, when Conservatives in the US have come out on record against Obama’s plan to address schoolchidren, one has to wonder what might be so concerning in the speech as to draw out such ire. Truth be told, there’s not much in the speech that anyone could find offense with. But some politicians, or district administrators, and even parents are concerned enough as to suggest that the speech be blocked, firewalled, or edited out of the school day. Avoided, for the potential disruption it may bring.

I think the key take-away here is the significant demonstration of overt leadership (NO c on that overt) that Obama is making here — this is a key role that some (not all) heads-of-state are highly respected for. The world doesn’t get high-quality orators coincident within every single world leader. Some operate less visibly and can go for days or weeks without significant press coverage or sound bite opportunities. Some just haven’t crafted their skills in delivery to such extent.

But Obama here seems to be going for more than just the sound bite. Here, in this context, he’s talking to the children. In the speech proper, he references other audiences/contexts where he has pleaded for responsible action and careful thought. And maybe this is what has some folks up in arms — the potential power inherent in the words of a dynamic and charismatic speaker. And maybe some are concerned that his words and delivery just might be able to achieve some success where NCLB hasn’t.

One can think of the moon landing speech given by JFK and the vision resulting in the decade-long drive to put man on the moon — a leader speaking and galvanizing a nation.

One can think of the powerful Martin Luther King Jr. “I have a dream” oratory that brought about powerful change in the history of the United States.

Sometimes, leaders need to “step up” and lead. Lead by speaking their mind in a powerful and dynamic manner, making decisions, setting goals, encouraging collaboration. Sometimes, this can come as a challenge to the status quo. Seems to me that winning the presidency presents Obama with both the opportunity and the responsibility to work to effect that change.

Here are a few concepts I’ll leave you with. They resonate with the tensions that may exist within many educators this weekend, catalyzed by the Obama Speech controversy.

  • Power and authority.
  • Firewalls, Gatekeepers, and Censorship.
  • Professional Responsibility and Decision Making.
  • Parenting.
  • Personal Responsibility.
  • Participatory Citizenship.
  • Indoctrination? or Leadership?

As educators, we need our learners to be able to successfully discuss and deal with these tensions. Hopefully their parents, their community leaders, and their governments can let them, and learn to do the same.

And always, we need to remember that demonstrating leadership is a critically important part of being an educator.

Here’s where I’ll be tuning in Tuesday at 12:00 noon EDT.
white-house-live-624x351


I Need My Teachers to Learn 1

Kevin Honeycutt‘s recent video I Need My Teachers to Learn came through my Twitterstream this evening.*

* courtesy of @mguhlin, who in turn was forwarding a link to Richard Byrne’s site Free Technology for Teachers, who himself references Wesley Fryer’s Moving at the Speed of Creativity blog. Wes heard of it from Rae Niles. I haven’t chased the thread further back, but this is the nature of the web. 🙂

(I’m mentioning this trace of the propagation of this video because it so nicely illustrates the power of social media connections between educators — it speaks volumes of the incredible potential for said technologies to revolutionize learning, for educators and learners alike.)

At any rate, the video’s title and catchy tune, coupled with the very important message, prompted me to post it here to edVisioned.ca. While I know many educators who continue to work in education for the very fact that they enjoy learning (as well as educating), the rapid pace of technological advance is creating the potential for a considerable gap between the currency of teaching methods and the use of technologies in schools. Not only do teachers need to continue to learn, teachers and administrators (along with IT departments) need to recognize the technologies accessed by students outside of schools are part of their “thinking” and “doing,” and we need to not only learn/understand these things, but advocate for their inclusion within out educational institutions.  Hats off to Kevin and his team for producing this:

I particularly connect with the third verse, which references netbooks, Skype, and district firewalls. Despite having toted a notebook for over a decade now (13 years? 14 years?) as a professional working in education, I grapple on a daily basis with a policy that denies me permission to connect to the network in my school. Imagine not being allowed to use a pencil! Or notepaper. Or a television. Or a DVD player. Or a phone.

But we will get there.

It will just take some time. And some advocacy.

And learning. Continual learning.

Both I and my students Need Me to Learn.